TY - GEN
T1 - Spectrum AUC Difference (SAUCD)
T2 - 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2024
AU - Luan, Tianyu
AU - Li, Zhong
AU - Chen, Lele
AU - Gong, Xuan
AU - Chen, Lichang
AU - Xu, Yi
AU - Yuan, Junsong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Existing 3D mesh shape evaluation metrics mainly focus on the overall shape but are usually less sensitive to local details. This makes them inconsistent with human evaluation, as human perception cares about both overall and detailed shape. In this paper, we propose an analytic metric named Spectrum Area Under the Curve Difference (SAUCD) that demonstrates better consistency with human evaluation. To compare the difference between two shapes, we first transform the 3D mesh to the spectrum domain using the discrete Laplace-Beltrami operator and Fourier transform. Then, we calculate the Area Under the Curve (AUC) difference between the two spectrums, so that each frequency band that captures either the overall or detailed shape is equitably considered. Taking human sensitivity across frequency bands into account, we further extend our metric by learning suitable weights for each frequency band which better aligns with human perception. To measure the performance of SAUCD, we build a 3D mesh evaluation dataset called Shape Grading, along with manual annotations from more than 800 subjects. By measuring the correlation between our metric and human evaluation, we demonstrate that SAUCD is well aligned with human evaluation, and outperforms previous 3D mesh metrics. Our project page: https://bit.ly/saucd.
AB - Existing 3D mesh shape evaluation metrics mainly focus on the overall shape but are usually less sensitive to local details. This makes them inconsistent with human evaluation, as human perception cares about both overall and detailed shape. In this paper, we propose an analytic metric named Spectrum Area Under the Curve Difference (SAUCD) that demonstrates better consistency with human evaluation. To compare the difference between two shapes, we first transform the 3D mesh to the spectrum domain using the discrete Laplace-Beltrami operator and Fourier transform. Then, we calculate the Area Under the Curve (AUC) difference between the two spectrums, so that each frequency band that captures either the overall or detailed shape is equitably considered. Taking human sensitivity across frequency bands into account, we further extend our metric by learning suitable weights for each frequency band which better aligns with human perception. To measure the performance of SAUCD, we build a 3D mesh evaluation dataset called Shape Grading, along with manual annotations from more than 800 subjects. By measuring the correlation between our metric and human evaluation, we demonstrate that SAUCD is well aligned with human evaluation, and outperforms previous 3D mesh metrics. Our project page: https://bit.ly/saucd.
KW - 3D shape evaluation; high-fidelity; human alignment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207252535
U2 - 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01905
DO - 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01905
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85207252535
T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
SP - 20155
EP - 20164
BT - Proceedings - 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2024
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 16 June 2024 through 22 June 2024
ER -