Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Signaling when (and When Not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships

  • Western Sydney University
  • University of Waterloo
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

A dual process model is proposed to explain how automatic evaluative associations to the partner (i.e., impulsive trust) and deliberative expectations of partner caring (i.e., reflective trust) interact to govern self-protection in romantic relationships. Experimental and correlational studies of dating and marital relationships supported the model. Subliminally conditioning more positive evaluative associations to the partner increased confidence in the partner's caring, suggesting that trust has an impulsive basis. Being high on impulsive trust (i.e., more positive evaluative associations to the partner on the Implicit Association Test; Zayas & Shoda, 2005) also reduced the automatic inclination to distance in response to doubts about the partner's trustworthiness. It similarly reduced self-protective behavioral reactions to these reflective trust concerns. The studies further revealed that the effects of impulsive trust depend on working memory capacity: Being high on impulsive trust inoculated against reflective trust concerns for people low on working memory capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-502
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Keywords

  • Automaticity
  • IAT
  • Risk regulation
  • Trust
  • Working memory capacity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Signaling when (and When Not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this