Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should I Cast an Ill-Informed Ballot? Examining the Contours of the Normative Obligation to Vote

  • Loyola University Chicago
  • Yale University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Proparticipatory norms play a central role in driving turnout. However, a broad norm that people are supposed to vote cannot explain why some people fail to participate or why rates of participation vary sharply across elections. We argue that the norm of voting extends beyond the mere act of voting. We present empirical evidence supporting the position that the social rewards for participating are conditional. The social rewards for casting an ill-informed vote are far smaller than those associated with casting an informed ballot. Moreover, some low-information voting strategies are viewed as less desirable than simply abstaining. Our findings illustrate an important constraint on the capacity of social norms to foster turnout. The effectiveness of efforts to translate norms into higher rates of turnout may depend on ensuring that voters are informed enough to cast a meaningful ballot.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1081-1099
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Keywords

  • informed voting
  • norms
  • survey experiment
  • turnout

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should I Cast an Ill-Informed Ballot? Examining the Contours of the Normative Obligation to Vote'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this