Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Shadows to Referents: An Ontological Interpretation of Plato’s Cave for Anomaly Resolution

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • National Center for Ontological Research

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper develops an ontological interpretation of Plato’s Cave to clarify the lifecycle of anomalies and their resolution. We argue that anomalies, as epistemic disruptions, exist only within bounded temporal regions; beginning with an initial observation and ending with resolution that reclassifies them into known categories. To formalize this lifecycle, we introduce the Anomaly Resolution Ontology (ARO) aligned with the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) and Common Core Ontologies (CCO). These ontologies model anomalies as temporally bounded continuants, together with the acts of observation and resolution that define their existence. The framework is illustrated through the Act of Epistemic Enlightenment, modeled as a resolution act that ends the anomaly and transforms unresolved information into resolved information. By linking the Cave allegory with anomaly resolution, this paper advances a semantic framework for representing epistemic transitions in AI, cognitive modeling, and intelligence analysis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume4176
StatePublished - 2025
Event2025 Joint Ontology Workshops, JOWO - Episode 11: The Sicilian Summer under the Etna - Catania, Italy
Duration: Sep 8 2025Sep 12 2025

Keywords

  • Anomaly
  • Basic Formal Ontology
  • Epistemic Uncertainty
  • Information Content Entity
  • Temporal Region

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shadows to Referents: An Ontological Interpretation of Plato’s Cave for Anomaly Resolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this