Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Serum biomarker panels for the detection of pancreatic cancer

  • Randall E. Brand
  • , Brian M. Nolen
  • , Herbert J. Zeh
  • , Peter J. Allen
  • , Mohamad A. Eloubeidi
  • , Michael Goldberg
  • , Eric Elton
  • , Juan P. Arnoletti
  • , John D. Christein
  • , Selwyn M. Vickers
  • , Christopher J. Langmead
  • , Douglas P. Landsittel
  • , David C. Whitcomb
  • , William E. Grizzle
  • , Anna E. Lokshin
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Carnegie Mellon University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

214 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Serum-biomarker based screening for pancreatic cancer could greatly improve survival in appropriately targeted high-risk populations. Experimental Design: Eighty-three circulating proteins were analyzed in sera of patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n = 333), benign pancreatic conditions (n = 144), and healthy control individuals (n = 227). Samples from each group were split randomly into training and blinded validation sets prior to analysis. A Metropolis algorithm with Monte Carlo simulation (MMC) was used to identify discriminatory biomarker panels in the training set. Identified panels were evaluated in the validation set and in patients diagnosed with colon (n = 33), lung (n = 62), and breast (n = 108) cancers. Results: Several robust profiles of protein alterations were present in sera of PDAC patients compared to the Healthy and Benign groups. In the training set (n=160 PDAC, 74 Benign, 107 Healthy), the panel of CA 19-9, ICAM-1, and OPG discriminated PDAC patients from Healthy controls with a sensitivity/specificity (SN/SP) of 88/90%, while the panel of CA 19-9, CEA, and TIMP-1 discriminated PDAC patients from Benign subjects with an SN/SP of 76/90%. In an independent validation set (n=173 PDAC, 70 Benign, 120 Healthy), the panel of CA 19-9, ICAM-1 and OPG demonstrated an SN/SP of 78/94% while the panel of CA19-9, CEA, and TIMP-1 demonstrated an SN/SP of 71/89%. The CA19-9, ICAM-1, OPGpanel is selective for PDAC and does not recognize breast (SP = 100%), lung (SP = 97%), or colon (SP = 97%) cancer. Conclusions: The PDAC-specific biomarker panels identified in this investigation warrant additional clinical validation to determine their role in screening targeted high-risk populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-816
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serum biomarker panels for the detection of pancreatic cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this