Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Scaling what works: a collaborative capacity-building program tailored to optimize resources and scale evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control

  • Mary Wangen
  • , Jingle Xu
  • , Amy Tran
  • , Elizabeth A. Rohan
  • , Prajakta Adsul
  • , Cam Escoffery
  • , Renée M. Ferrari
  • , Nikki Hayes
  • , Cari Herington
  • , Katie Jones
  • , Jaron Hoani King
  • , Julie Kranick
  • , Alyssa LaMonica
  • , Rebecca J. Lee
  • , Meghan C. O’Leary
  • , Malesa Pereira
  • , Mary Puckett
  • , Shixiu Ricardo
  • , Rogelio Robles-Morales
  • , Kelly Smith
  • Lisa P. Spees, Amy Thompson, Stephanie B. Wheeler, Nathaniel Woodard, Alison T. Brenner, Rachel Hirschey
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • University of New Mexico
  • Emory University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Nevada Cancer Coalition
  • Iowa Department of Health and Human Services
  • New York University
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
  • University of Arizona
  • State of Rhode Island

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the Scaling What Works (SWW) program, which was developed to support the scale-up of projects that implement evidence-based cancer prevention and control interventions (CPC EBIs) across award recipients (hereafter, “awardees”) of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP). SWW projects included (1) Project ECHO and patient navigation, (2) Addressing risk factors for adult cancers during childhood, and (3) Increasing receipt of ovarian cancer care from gynecologic oncologists. In this evaluation, we sought to understand how tailored training and technical assistance (TA) can facilitate the implementation of CPC EBIs in NCCCP settings. Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach, comprising a needs assessment with focus groups and information sessions. Subsequent training and TA included a symposium and four virtual learning collaborative sessions. The evaluation included pre- and post-surveys to assess changes in participants’ confidence and satisfaction alongside qualitative feedback to refine the program. Results: The SWW program reached 89 individuals across 40 NCCCP awardees. Participants reported significant improvements in their confidence to implement, adapt, and sustain EBIs, with increases observed in all domains assessed. Feedback from the symposium and learning collaborative sessions indicated high satisfaction and notable progress in addressing barriers related to EBI implementation. Conclusion: The SWW program effectively addressed key challenges in scaling CPC interventions by providing tailored, interactive training and TA. Further engagement and continued capacity-building support are recommended to enhance the long-term impact of SWW across the NCCCP. The findings underscore the importance of investing in tailored, large-scale capacity-building to support the scale-up of evidence-based CPC approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Article number80
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2026

Keywords

  • Capacity building
  • Community of practice
  • Evidence-based interventions
  • Learning collaboratives
  • Mentorship
  • National comprehensive cancer control programs
  • Peer learning
  • Technical assistance
  • Training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scaling what works: a collaborative capacity-building program tailored to optimize resources and scale evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this