Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Scalable ranked retrieval using document images

  • University of Maryland, College Park

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite the explosion of text on the Internet, hard copy documents that have been scanned as images still play a significant role for some tasks. The best method to perform ranked retrieval on a large corpus of document images, however, remains an open research question. The most common approach has been to perform text retrieval using terms generated by optical character recognition. This paper, by contrast, examines whether a scalable segmentation-free image retrieval algorithm, which matches sub-images containing text or graphical objects, can provide additional benefit in satisfying a user's information needs on a large, real world dataset. Results on 7 million scanned pages from the CDIP v1.0 test collection show that content based image retrieval finds a substantial number of documents that text retrieval misses, and that when used as a basis for relevance feedback can yield improvements in retrieval effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging - Document Recognition and Retrieval XXI
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
EventDocument Recognition and Retrieval XXI - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 5 2014Feb 6 2014

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume9021
ISSN (Print)0277-786X
ISSN (Electronic)1996-756X

Conference

ConferenceDocument Recognition and Retrieval XXI
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period02/5/1402/6/14

Keywords

  • Content Based Image Retrieval
  • Document Image Retrieval
  • Feature Indexing
  • Interest Points
  • OCR
  • Relevance Feedback

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scalable ranked retrieval using document images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this