Abstract
We review the weighted likelihood estimating equations methodology introduced by Markatou, Basu and Lindsay (1995). and Basu, Markatou and Lindsay (1995) and compare it, in the case of symmetric and asymmetric contamination, with Huber's M-estimators of location. The simulation study shows that the weighted likelihood estimating equations estimator is at least as competitive as Huber's M-estimators in the case of symmetric contamination. In the case of asymmetric contamination it may be superior than Huber's M-estimators.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2597-2613 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1996 |
Keywords
- Bias
- Estimating equations
- Influence function
- Likelihood
- Robustness
- Weight function
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Robust statistical inference: Weighted likelihoods or usual M-Estimation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver