Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Responses to Upward and Downward Social Comparisons: The Impact of Esteem-Relevance and Perceived Control

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

A number of theories of human behavior share the assumption that we learn about and evaluate ourselves, our potentials, and our circumstances in life in part by social comparisons, that is, through comparing our abilities, opinions, emotions, and outcomes with those of others. Theory and research focussed on social comparison processes (Festinger, 1954; Suls & Miller, 1977) has, for the most part, addressed the question of which others people select for comparison purposes. This emphasis on choice of comparison other is reflected in early research investigating when people choose to compare themselves with similar versus dissimilar others (e.g., Wheeler et al., 1969; Zanna, Goethals & Hill, 1975), and contemporary research on downward social comparisons (Wills, 1981; 1987), and choice of comparisons among people coping with victimization (e.g., Wood, Taylor & Lichtman, 1985).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial Comparison
Subtitle of host publicationContemporary Theory and Research
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages237-260
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781040025543
ISBN (Print)9781032744902
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responses to Upward and Downward Social Comparisons: The Impact of Esteem-Relevance and Perceived Control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this