Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard

Curt B. Haselton; Andy Fry; Jack W. Baker; Ronald O. Hamburger; Andrew S. Whittaker; Jonathan P. Stewart; Kenneth J. Elwood; Nicolas Luco; John D. Hooper; Finley A. Charney; Reid B. Zimmerman; Robert G. Pekelnicky

doi:10.4231/D33R0PT91

Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard

Curt B. Haselton
, Andy Fry
, Jack W. Baker
, Ronald O. Hamburger
, Andrew S. Whittaker
, Jonathan P. Stewart
, Kenneth J. Elwood
, Nicolas Luco
, John D. Hooper
, Finley A. Charney
, Reid B. Zimmerman
, Robert G. Pekelnicky

Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering

California State University Chico
Magnusson Klemencic Assoc.
Stanford University
Simpson Gumpertz and Heger, Inc.
University of California at Los Angeles
University of British Columbia
United States Geological Survey
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Rutherford + Chekene
Degenkolb Engineers

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper is the result of a multi-year effort to rewrite Chapter 16 of the ASCE/SEI 7-10 Standard, which is entitled Seismic Response-History Procedure. This paper documents the newly-proposed Chapter 16 requirements, as well as the rationale and logic behind the requirements. The goals of this paper are to: (a) explain the rationale for the newly proposed requirements, for those interested in why changes are being proposed; and (b) provide detailed explanation of the new requirements, to help future users properly apply the requirements in the design of new buildings. This effort was initiated by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) Provisions Update Committee (PUC) who formed an Issue Team with the specific mandate of proposing a fully rewritten version of Chapter 16. This newly proposed Chapter 16 will become a part of the 2014 National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) Provisions and then will be considered for inclusion in the ASCE/SEI 7-16 Standard.

Original language	English
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4231/D33R0PT91
State	Published - 2014
Event	10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014 - Anchorage, United States Duration: Jul 21 2014 → Jul 25 2014

Conference

Conference	10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014
Country/Territory	United States
City	Anchorage
Period	07/21/14 → 07/25/14

Access to Document

10.4231/D33R0PT91

Cite this

Haselton, C. B., Fry, A., Baker, J. W., Hamburger, R. O., Whittaker, A. S., Stewart, J. P., Elwood, K. J., Luco, N., Hooper, J. D., Charney, F. A., Zimmerman, R. B., & Pekelnicky, R. G. (2014). Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard. Paper presented at 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014, Anchorage, United States. https://doi.org/10.4231/D33R0PT91

Haselton, Curt B. ; Fry, Andy ; Baker, Jack W. et al. / Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings : A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard. Paper presented at 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014, Anchorage, United States.

@conference{282a906b592342d194ca61457475c755,

title = "Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard",

abstract = "This paper is the result of a multi-year effort to rewrite Chapter 16 of the ASCE/SEI 7-10 Standard, which is entitled Seismic Response-History Procedure. This paper documents the newly-proposed Chapter 16 requirements, as well as the rationale and logic behind the requirements. The goals of this paper are to: (a) explain the rationale for the newly proposed requirements, for those interested in why changes are being proposed; and (b) provide detailed explanation of the new requirements, to help future users properly apply the requirements in the design of new buildings. This effort was initiated by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) Provisions Update Committee (PUC) who formed an Issue Team with the specific mandate of proposing a fully rewritten version of Chapter 16. This newly proposed Chapter 16 will become a part of the 2014 National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) Provisions and then will be considered for inclusion in the ASCE/SEI 7-16 Standard.",

author = "Haselton, \{Curt B.\} and Andy Fry and Baker, \{Jack W.\} and Hamburger, \{Ronald O.\} and Whittaker, \{Andrew S.\} and Stewart, \{Jonathan P.\} and Elwood, \{Kenneth J.\} and Nicolas Luco and Hooper, \{John D.\} and Charney, \{Finley A.\} and Zimmerman, \{Reid B.\} and Pekelnicky, \{Robert G.\}",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.4231/D33R0PT91",

language = "English",

note = "10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014 ; Conference date: 21-07-2014 Through 25-07-2014",

}

Haselton, CB, Fry, A, Baker, JW, Hamburger, RO, Whittaker, AS, Stewart, JP, Elwood, KJ, Luco, N, Hooper, JD, Charney, FA, Zimmerman, RB & Pekelnicky, RG 2014, 'Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard', Paper presented at 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014, Anchorage, United States, 07/21/14 - 07/25/14. https://doi.org/10.4231/D33R0PT91

Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard. / Haselton, Curt B.; Fry, Andy; Baker, Jack W. et al.
2014. Paper presented at 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014, Anchorage, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings

T2 - 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014

AU - Haselton, Curt B.

AU - Fry, Andy

AU - Baker, Jack W.

AU - Hamburger, Ronald O.

AU - Whittaker, Andrew S.

AU - Stewart, Jonathan P.

AU - Elwood, Kenneth J.

AU - Luco, Nicolas

AU - Hooper, John D.

AU - Charney, Finley A.

AU - Zimmerman, Reid B.

AU - Pekelnicky, Robert G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper is the result of a multi-year effort to rewrite Chapter 16 of the ASCE/SEI 7-10 Standard, which is entitled Seismic Response-History Procedure. This paper documents the newly-proposed Chapter 16 requirements, as well as the rationale and logic behind the requirements. The goals of this paper are to: (a) explain the rationale for the newly proposed requirements, for those interested in why changes are being proposed; and (b) provide detailed explanation of the new requirements, to help future users properly apply the requirements in the design of new buildings. This effort was initiated by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) Provisions Update Committee (PUC) who formed an Issue Team with the specific mandate of proposing a fully rewritten version of Chapter 16. This newly proposed Chapter 16 will become a part of the 2014 National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) Provisions and then will be considered for inclusion in the ASCE/SEI 7-16 Standard.

AB - This paper is the result of a multi-year effort to rewrite Chapter 16 of the ASCE/SEI 7-10 Standard, which is entitled Seismic Response-History Procedure. This paper documents the newly-proposed Chapter 16 requirements, as well as the rationale and logic behind the requirements. The goals of this paper are to: (a) explain the rationale for the newly proposed requirements, for those interested in why changes are being proposed; and (b) provide detailed explanation of the new requirements, to help future users properly apply the requirements in the design of new buildings. This effort was initiated by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) Provisions Update Committee (PUC) who formed an Issue Team with the specific mandate of proposing a fully rewritten version of Chapter 16. This newly proposed Chapter 16 will become a part of the 2014 National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) Provisions and then will be considered for inclusion in the ASCE/SEI 7-16 Standard.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84929001438

U2 - 10.4231/D33R0PT91

DO - 10.4231/D33R0PT91

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84929001438

Y2 - 21 July 2014 through 25 July 2014

ER -

Haselton CB, Fry A, Baker JW, Hamburger RO, Whittaker AS, Stewart JP et al.. Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard. 2014. Paper presented at 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, NCEE 2014, Anchorage, United States. doi: 10.4231/D33R0PT91

Response-history analysis for the design of new buildings: A fully revised chapter 16 methodology proposed for the 2015 NEHRP provisions and the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this