Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Responding to Ecosystem Transformation: Resist, Accept, or Direct?

  • Laura M. Thompson
  • , Abigail J. Lynch
  • , Erik A. Beever
  • , Augustin C. Engman
  • , Jeffrey A. Falke
  • , Stephen T. Jackson
  • , Trevor J. Krabbenhoft
  • , David J. Lawrence
  • , Douglas Limpinsel
  • , Robert T. Magill
  • , Tracy A. Melvin
  • , John M. Morton
  • , Robert A. Newman
  • , Jay O. Peterson
  • , Mark T. Porath
  • , Frank J. Rahel
  • , Suresh A. Sethi
  • , Jennifer L. Wilkening
  • University of Tennessee
  • United States Geological Survey
  • Montana State University
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks
  • University of Arizona
  • U.S. Department of the Interior
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Arizona Game and Fish Department
  • Michigan State University
  • University of North Dakota
  • Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
  • University of Wyoming
  • Cornell University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

109 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ecosystem transformation can be defined as the emergence of a self-organizing, self-sustaining, ecological or social–ecological system that deviates from prior ecosystem structure and function. These transformations are occurring across the globe; consequently, a static view of ecosystem processes is likely no longer sufficient for managing fish, wildlife, and other species. We present a framework that encompasses three strategies for fish and wildlife managers dealing with ecosystems vulnerable to transformation. Specifically, managers can resist change and strive to maintain existing ecosystem composition, structure, and function; accept transformation when it is not feasible to resist change or when changes are deemed socially acceptable; or direct change to a future ecosystem configuration that would yield desirable outcomes. Choice of a particular option likely hinges on anticipating future change, while also acknowledging that temporal and spatial scales, recent history and current state of the system, and magnitude of change can factor into the decision. This suite of management strategies can be implemented using a structured approach of learning and adapting as ecosystems change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-21
Number of pages14
JournalFisheries
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to Ecosystem Transformation: Resist, Accept, or Direct?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this