Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reply to the 'Comment on "pressure enhancement in carbon nanopores: A major confinement effect"' by D. van Dijk,: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP02890K

  • Yun Long
  • , Jeremy C. Palmer
  • , Benoit Coasne
  • , Kaihang Shi
  • , Małgorzata Śliwińska-Bartkowiak
  • , Keith E. Gubbins
  • North Carolina State University
  • University of Houston
  • Université Grenoble Alpes
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

In his 'Comment' van Dijk points out that the local pressure at a point r in an inhomogeneous thermodynamic system, like other thermodynamic properties, is not uniquely defined; one must make an operational definition that involves deciding how to assign the intermolecular forces between pairs of molecules to the point r. This non-uniqueness difficulty is well known, and was discussed in our paper. It was discussed in detail in the 1950 paper of Irving and Kirkwood, and in many books and papers since then. We reply to these comments, and note that an average of the local pressure over a region of space may yield a well-defined pressure. We also discuss other possible ways to quantify the adsorption compression effect near an attractive wall. van Dijk also suggests that the non-uniqueness difficulty can be avoided by using the pressure of the uniform bulk fluid in equilibrium with the pore. While this pressure is well-defined, it only reflects the intermolecular forces in the bulk phase, and gives no information about the behavior in the pore.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9826-9830
Number of pages5
JournalPhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Volume22
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - May 7 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to the 'Comment on "pressure enhancement in carbon nanopores: A major confinement effect"' by D. van Dijk,: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP02890K'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this