Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reliable medical recommendation systems with patient privacy

  • University of Notre Dame

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the concerns patients have when confronted with a medical condition is which physician to trust. Any recommendation system that seeks to answer this question must ensure any sensitive medical information collected by the system is properly secured. In this paper we codify these privacy concerns in a privacy-friendly framework and present two architectures that realize it: the Secure Processing Architecture (SPA) and the Anonymous Contributions Architecture (ACA). In SPA, patients submit their ratings in a protected form without revealing any information about their data, and the computation of recommendations proceeds over the protected data using secure multi-party computation techniques. In ACA, patients submit their ratings in the clear, but no link between a submission and patient data can be made. We discuss various aspects of both architectures including techniques for ensuring reliability of computed recommendations and system performance, and provide their comparison.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIHI'10 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
Pages173-182
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Event1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, IHI'10 - Arlington, VA, United States
Duration: Nov 11 2010Nov 12 2010

Publication series

NameIHI'10 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium

Conference

Conference1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, IHI'10
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityArlington, VA
Period11/11/1011/12/10

Keywords

  • framework
  • privacy
  • recommendation systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliable medical recommendation systems with patient privacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this