Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Relationships between self-diffusivity, packing fraction, and excess entropy in simple bulk and confined fluids

  • University of Texas at Austin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

101 Scopus citations

Abstract

Static measures such as density and entropy, which are intimately connected to structure, have featured prominently in modern thinking about the dynamics of the liquid state. Here, we explore the connections between self-diffusivity, density, and excess entropy for two of the most widely used model "simple" liquids, the equilibrium Lennard-Jones and square-well fluids, in both bulk and confined environments. We find that the self-diffusivity data of the Lennard-Jones fluid can be approximately collapsed onto a single curve (i) versus effective packing fraction and (ii) in appropriately reduced form versus excess entropy, as suggested by two well-known scaling laws. Similar data collapse does not occur for the square-well fluid, a fact that can be understood on the basis of the nontrivial effects that temperature has on its static structure. Nonetheless, we show that the implications of confinement for the self-diffusivity of both of these model fluids, over a broad range of equilibrium conditions, can be predicted on the basis of knowledge of the bulk fluid behavior and either the effective packing fraction or the excess entropy of the confined fluid. Excess entropy is perhaps the most preferable route due to its superior predictive ability and because it is a standard, unambiguous thermodynamic quantity that can be readily predicted via classical density functional theories of inhomogeneous fluids.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10054-10063
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry B
Volume111
Issue number34
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 30 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationships between self-diffusivity, packing fraction, and excess entropy in simple bulk and confined fluids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this