Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Referent tracking: The problem of negative findings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paradigm of referent tracking is based on a realist presupposition which rejects so-called negative entities (congenital absent nipple, and the like) as spurious. How, then, can a referent tracking-based Electronic Health Record deal with what are standardly called 'negative findings'? To answer this question we carried out an analysis of some 748 sentences drawn from patient charts and containing some form of negation. Our analysis shows that to deal with these sentences we need to introduce a new ontological relationship between a particular and a universal, which holds when no instance of the universal has a specific qualified ontological relation with the particular. This relation is found to be able to accommodate nearly all occurrences of negative findings in the examined sample, in ways which involve no reference to negative entities.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUbiquity
Subtitle of host publicationTechnologies for Better Health in Aging Societies - Proceedings of MIE 2006
PublisherIOS Press
Pages741-746
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)1586036475, 9781586036478
StatePublished - 2006
Event20th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE 2006 - Maastricht, Netherlands
Duration: Aug 27 2006Aug 30 2006

Publication series

NameStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume124
ISSN (Print)0926-9630
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8365

Conference

Conference20th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE 2006
Country/TerritoryNetherlands
CityMaastricht
Period08/27/0608/30/06

Keywords

  • EHR
  • negation
  • negative findings
  • ontology
  • realism
  • referent tracking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Referent tracking: The problem of negative findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this