Abstract
In missing data analysis, the assumption of the missing data mechanism is crucial. Under different assumptions, different statistical methods have to be developed accordingly; however, in reality this kind of assumption is usually unverifiable. Therefore a less stringent, and hence more flexible, assumption is preferred. In this paper, we consider a generally applicable missing data mechanism. Under this general missing data mechanism, we introduce the conditional likelihood and its approximate version as the base for estimating the unknown parameter of interest. Since this approximate conditional likelihood uses the completely observed samples only, it may result in large estimation bias, which could deteriorate the statistical inference and also jeopardise other statistical procedure. To tackle this problem, we propose to use some resampling techniques to reduce the estimation bias. We consider both the Jackknife and the Bootstrap in our paper. We compare their asymptotic biases through a higher order expansion up to O(n−1). We also derive some results for the mean squared error (MSE) in terms of estimation accuracy. We conduct comprehensive simulation studies under different situations to illustrate our proposed method. We also apply our method to a prostate cancer data analysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 577-593 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Nonparametric Statistics |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 3 2017 |
Keywords
- approximate conditional likelihood
- bias
- higher order asymptotic expansion
- Missing data mechanism
- resampling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing bias for maximum approximate conditional likelihood estimator with general missing data mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver