TY - GEN
T1 - Reconciliation of ontology and terminology to cope with linguistics
AU - Baud, Robert H.
AU - Ceusters, Werner
AU - Ruch, Patrick
AU - Rassinoux, Anne Marie
AU - Lovis, Christian
AU - Geissbühler, Antoine
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Objectives: To discuss the relationships between ontologies, terminologies and language in the context of Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications in order to show the negative consequences of confusing them. Methods: The viewpoints of the terminologist and (computational) linguist are developed separately, and then compared, leading to the presentation of reconciliation among these points of view, with consideration of the role of the ontologist. Results: In order to encourage appropriate usage of terminologies, guidelines are presented advocating the simultaneous publication of pragmatic vocabularies supported by terminological material based on adequate ontological analysis. Conclusions: Ontologies, terminologies and natural languages each have their own purpose. Ontologies support machine understanding, natural languages support human communication, and terminologies should form the bridge between them. Therefore, future terminology standards should be based on sound ontology and do justice to the diversities in natural languages. Moreover, they should support local vocabularies, in order to be easily adaptable to local needs and practices.
AB - Objectives: To discuss the relationships between ontologies, terminologies and language in the context of Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications in order to show the negative consequences of confusing them. Methods: The viewpoints of the terminologist and (computational) linguist are developed separately, and then compared, leading to the presentation of reconciliation among these points of view, with consideration of the role of the ontologist. Results: In order to encourage appropriate usage of terminologies, guidelines are presented advocating the simultaneous publication of pragmatic vocabularies supported by terminological material based on adequate ontological analysis. Conclusions: Ontologies, terminologies and natural languages each have their own purpose. Ontologies support machine understanding, natural languages support human communication, and terminologies should form the bridge between them. Therefore, future terminology standards should be based on sound ontology and do justice to the diversities in natural languages. Moreover, they should support local vocabularies, in order to be easily adaptable to local needs and practices.
KW - natural language processing
KW - ontology
KW - terminology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/38449110472
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 17911826
AN - SCOPUS:38449110472
SN - 9781586037741
T3 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
SP - 796
EP - 801
BT - MEDINFO 2007 - Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics
PB - IOS Press
T2 - 12th World Congress on Medical Informatics, MEDINFO 2007
Y2 - 20 August 2007 through 24 August 2007
ER -