TY - JOUR
T1 - Reasons for Not Enrolling in a Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Preferences for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment
AU - Carland, Andrea
AU - Weiss-Laxer, Nomi
AU - Martindale, Moriah
AU - DiVasta, Alexandra
AU - Freitas, Michael
AU - Haider, Mohammad Nadir
AU - Bisson, Leslie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Research Purpose: Low enrollment in randomized control trials (RCTs) poses a threat to external validity. We conducted a secondary analysis to identify factors associated with patients’ decisions to enroll in an RCT of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatments (injection, physical therapy, or combination). We assessed the extent to which demographic characteristics, treatment preferences, and history varied by patients’ decisions to enroll. Among those who declined, we examined patterns in their treatment decisions. Major Findings: Among those who declined (n = 124), treatment history was associated with treatment decisions. Patients receiving injections had the highest BMI, patients receiving PT had the highest proportion of prior surgery, and treatment naïve patients had the highest proportion of PT referrals. Reasons for declining enrollment included strong treatment preference, unwillingness to be randomized, and logistics. Treatment preferences and treatment history appear to be associated with RCT enrollment. Conclusions: Findings from our secondary analysis could inform future KOA research by encouraging researchers to consider treatment preferences and randomization tolerance. We make suggestions for improvement of study enrollment, such as patient advocacy.
AB - Research Purpose: Low enrollment in randomized control trials (RCTs) poses a threat to external validity. We conducted a secondary analysis to identify factors associated with patients’ decisions to enroll in an RCT of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatments (injection, physical therapy, or combination). We assessed the extent to which demographic characteristics, treatment preferences, and history varied by patients’ decisions to enroll. Among those who declined, we examined patterns in their treatment decisions. Major Findings: Among those who declined (n = 124), treatment history was associated with treatment decisions. Patients receiving injections had the highest BMI, patients receiving PT had the highest proportion of prior surgery, and treatment naïve patients had the highest proportion of PT referrals. Reasons for declining enrollment included strong treatment preference, unwillingness to be randomized, and logistics. Treatment preferences and treatment history appear to be associated with RCT enrollment. Conclusions: Findings from our secondary analysis could inform future KOA research by encouraging researchers to consider treatment preferences and randomization tolerance. We make suggestions for improvement of study enrollment, such as patient advocacy.
KW - conservative treatment
KW - intraarticular injection
KW - knee osteoarthritis
KW - patient preferences
KW - physical therapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019182539
U2 - 10.1177/23743735251383853
DO - 10.1177/23743735251383853
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019182539
SN - 2374-3735
VL - 12
JO - Journal of Patient Experience
JF - Journal of Patient Experience
M1 - 23743735251383853
ER -