Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

RDF versus attributed graphs: The war for the best graph representation

  • CUBRC

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this work, methods are developed to overcome the inherent problems of network abstraction and analysis from multiple heterogeneous data sources. RDF and attributed graphs are two common choices for graph modeling. While both are very similar with respect to the type of information that can be represented, characteristics intrinsic to each representation affect the analysis performed over the resultant network abstractions. By selecting a dual graph representation approach and leveraging the strengths of both models, the semantic analysis performed over RDF graphs is combined with the topological analysis applied to attributed graphs, to produce a comprehensive foundation for network analysis that cannot be easily achieved, nor its value matched, by one representation independently.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2015 18th International Conference on Information Fusion, Fusion 2015
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages200-206
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9780982443866
StatePublished - Sep 14 2015
Event18th International Conference on Information Fusion, Fusion 2015 - Washington, United States
Duration: Jul 6 2015Jul 9 2015

Publication series

Name2015 18th International Conference on Information Fusion, Fusion 2015

Conference

Conference18th International Conference on Information Fusion, Fusion 2015
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityWashington
Period07/6/1507/9/15

Keywords

  • attributed graphs
  • data alignment
  • Graphs
  • network abstraction
  • RDF

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'RDF versus attributed graphs: The war for the best graph representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this