Rating the Quality of Evidence and Making Recommendations: A Guide to the Spectrum of Clinical Research

Holger J. Schünemann; Martin Stanulla; Jan L. Brozek; Gordon G. Guyatt

doi:10.1002/9781444300857.ch1

Rating the Quality of Evidence and Making Recommendations: A Guide to the Spectrum of Clinical Research

Holger J. Schünemann
, Martin Stanulla
, Jan L. Brozek
, Gordon G. Guyatt

Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health

Hannover Medical School
IRCCS Istituti fisioterapici ospitalieri - Istituto Regina Elena
Polish Institute for EBM
McMaster University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Question formulation and recommendations in this book Evaluating the quality of evidence and making recommendations Strength of the recommendation Interpreting strong and weak recommendations How methodologic quality of the evidence contributes to strength of recommendation Interpreting the recommendations Summary References.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Evidence-Based Hematology
Publisher	wiley
Pages	1-9
Number of pages	9
ISBN (Electronic)	9781444300857
ISBN (Print)	9781405157476
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444300857.ch1
State	Published - Jan 1 2008

Keywords

Clinical questions relevant to hematology practice
Clinicians requiring clinical expertise to integrate patient's circumstances and values
Evaluating quality of evidence and making recommendations
Evidence-based hematology
Factors increasing quality of evidence
Grading recommendations
Implications of strong and weak recommendations
Methodologic quality of evidence contributing to strength of recommendation
Systematic approach to grading quality of evidence

Access to Document

10.1002/9781444300857.ch1

Cite this

@inbook{53d281ef087048acaa251a5602aa61c1,

title = "Rating the Quality of Evidence and Making Recommendations: A Guide to the Spectrum of Clinical Research",

abstract = "This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Question formulation and recommendations in this book Evaluating the quality of evidence and making recommendations Strength of the recommendation Interpreting strong and weak recommendations How methodologic quality of the evidence contributes to strength of recommendation Interpreting the recommendations Summary References.",

keywords = "Clinical questions relevant to hematology practice, Clinicians requiring clinical expertise to integrate patient's circumstances and values, Evaluating quality of evidence and making recommendations, Evidence-based hematology, Factors increasing quality of evidence, Grading recommendations, Implications of strong and weak recommendations, Methodologic quality of evidence contributing to strength of recommendation, Systematic approach to grading quality of evidence",

author = "Sch{\"u}nemann, \{Holger J.\} and Martin Stanulla and Brozek, \{Jan L.\} and Guyatt, \{Gordon G.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2008 Blackwell Publishing.",

year = "2008",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/9781444300857.ch1",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781405157476",

pages = "1--9",

booktitle = "Evidence-Based Hematology",

publisher = "wiley",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Rating the Quality of Evidence and Making Recommendations

T2 - A Guide to the Spectrum of Clinical Research

AU - Schünemann, Holger J.

AU - Stanulla, Martin

AU - Brozek, Jan L.

AU - Guyatt, Gordon G.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Question formulation and recommendations in this book Evaluating the quality of evidence and making recommendations Strength of the recommendation Interpreting strong and weak recommendations How methodologic quality of the evidence contributes to strength of recommendation Interpreting the recommendations Summary References.

AB - This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Question formulation and recommendations in this book Evaluating the quality of evidence and making recommendations Strength of the recommendation Interpreting strong and weak recommendations How methodologic quality of the evidence contributes to strength of recommendation Interpreting the recommendations Summary References.

KW - Clinical questions relevant to hematology practice

KW - Clinicians requiring clinical expertise to integrate patient's circumstances and values

KW - Evaluating quality of evidence and making recommendations

KW - Evidence-based hematology

KW - Factors increasing quality of evidence

KW - Grading recommendations

KW - Implications of strong and weak recommendations

KW - Methodologic quality of evidence contributing to strength of recommendation

KW - Systematic approach to grading quality of evidence

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84890984809

U2 - 10.1002/9781444300857.ch1

DO - 10.1002/9781444300857.ch1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84890984809

SN - 9781405157476

SP - 1

EP - 9

BT - Evidence-Based Hematology

PB - wiley

ER -

Rating the Quality of Evidence and Making Recommendations: A Guide to the Spectrum of Clinical Research

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this