Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis

  • MGTX Study Group
  • George Washington University
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Heidelberg University 
  • University of Göttingen
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • University of British Columbia
  • Universidad de Chile
  • University of Cape Town
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Mahidol University
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Southern California
  • McGill University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Harvard University
  • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Oxford
  • Universidade de Brasília
  • Kanazawa University
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • University of Florida
  • Augusta University
  • Medical University of Warsaw
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
  • Leiden University
  • Duke University
  • Ohio State University
  • Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • University of Miami
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Vermont
  • University of California at Irvine
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Columbia University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

539 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone. METHODS: We compared extended transsternal thymectomy plus alternate-day prednisone with alternate-day prednisone alone. Patients 18 to 65 years of age who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis with a disease duration of less than 5 years were included if they had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical class II to IV disease (on a scale from I to V, with higher classes indicating more severe disease) and elevated circulating concentrations of acetylcholine-receptor antibody. The primary outcomes were the time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (on a scale from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) over a 3-year period, as assessed by means of blinded rating, and the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone over a 3-year period. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent randomization between 2006 and 2012 at 36 sites. Patients who underwent thymectomy had a lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score over a 3-year period than those who received prednisone alone (6.15 vs. 8.99, P<0.001); patients in the thymectomy group also had a lower average requirement for alternate-day prednisone (44 mg vs. 60 mg, P<0.001). Fewer patients in the thymectomy group than in the prednisone-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or were hospitalized for exacerbations (9% vs. 37%, P<0.001). The number of patients with treatment-associated complications did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.73), but patients in the thymectomy group had fewer treatment-associated symptoms related to immunosuppressive medications (P<0.001) and lower distress levels related to symptoms (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Thymectomy improved clinical outcomes over a 3-year period in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-522
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume375
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 11 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this