Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies

  • On behalf of the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study and the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
  • , Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
  • University of Virginia
  • Yale University
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Harvard University
  • Queensland Institute of Medical Research
  • Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of Southern California
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Wayne State University
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Duke University
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
  • University of Tennessee Medical Center
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of Washington
  • University of Utah
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • University of New Mexico
  • Provincial Health Services Authority
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Stanford University
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer incidence differs substantially by race/ethnicity, but the reasons for this are not well understood. Data were pooled from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES) and 11 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) to examine racial/ethnic differences in epidemiological characteristics with suspected involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) aetiology. Methods: We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate associations for 17 reproductive, hormonal and lifestyle characteristics and EOC risk by race/ethnicity among 10 924 women with invasive EOC (8918 Non-Hispanic Whites, 433 Hispanics, 911 Blacks, 662 Asian/Pacific Islanders) and 16 150 controls (13 619 Non-Hispanic Whites, 533 Hispanics, 1233 Blacks, 765 Asian/Pacific Islanders). Likelihood ratio tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity in the risk factor associations by race/ethnicity. Results: We observed statistically significant racial/ethnic heterogeneity for hysterectomy and EOC risk (P=0.008), where the largest odds ratio (OR) was observed in Black women [OR=1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34-2.02] compared with other racial/ ethnic groups. Although not statistically significant, the associations for parity, firstdegree family history of ovarian or breast cancer, and endometriosis varied by race/ethnicity. Asian/Pacific Islanders had the greatest magnitude of association for parity (≥3 births: OR=0.38, 95% CI=0.28-0.54), and Black women had the largest ORs for family history (OR=1.77, 95% CI=1.42-2.21) and endometriosis (OR=2.42, 95% CI=1.65- 3.55). Conclusions: Although racial/ethnic heterogeneity was observed for hysterectomy, our findings support the validity of EOC risk factors across all racial/ethnic groups, and further suggest that any racial/ethnic population with a higher prevalence of a modifiable risk factor should be targeted to disseminate information about prevention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)460-472
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: A pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this