Abstract
Power theorists are divided on the question of whether individual powers are single-track (for a single manifestation type) or are multi-track (capable of producing distinct manifestation types for distinct stimuli). EJ Lowe has recently defended single-tracking, arguing that the multi-tracker can provide no adequate reason for treating powers as capable of having multiple manifestation types, and claiming that putative instances of multi-track powers are either single-track powers in need of unifying descriptions or are merely several single-track powers. I respond to Lowe on behalf of the multi-tracker, first by arguing that he overlooks the extra-empirical features of the debate, then by posing a dilemma for any single-track account of powers concerning the single-tracker's ability to appropriately deal with fine-grained manifestation types. Finally I provide the aforementioned reason for thinking that there are multi-track powers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 581-595 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Philosophia (United States) |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2011 |
Keywords
- Dispositions
- Essence
- Individuation
- Multi-track
- Powers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Putting Powers Back on Multi-Track'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver