Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation

  • Benoit Godin
  • , Joseph P. Lane
    • Institut national de la recherche scientifique

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

    101 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Much has been written about the linear model of innovation. While it may have been the dominant model used to explain technological innovation for decades, alternatives did exist. One such alternative-generally discussed as being the exact opposite of the linear model-is the demand-pull model. Beginning in the 1960s, people from different disciplines started looking at technological innovation from a demand rather than a supply perspective. The theory was that technological innovation is stimulated by market demand rather than by scientific discoveries. However, few traces of the demand-pull model remain in the literature today. This article looks at what happened to the demand-pull model from a historical perspective, at three points in time: birth, crystallization, and death. It suggests that the idea of demand as a factor explaining technological innovation emerged in the 1960s, was formalized into models in the 1970-1980s, then got integrated into "multidimensional" models. From then on, the demand-pull model disappeared from the literature, existing only as an object of the past, like the linear model of innovation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)621-654
    Number of pages34
    JournalScience Technology and Human Values
    Volume38
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2013

    Keywords

    • demand-pull model
    • innovation policy
    • Innovation studies
    • linear model of innovation
    • science
    • supply of inventions
    • technological innovation
    • technology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this