Abstract
The article explores-from a utility/adaptation perspective-the role of prototype and exemplar processes in categorization. The author surveys important category tasks within the categorization literature from the perspective of the optimality of applying prototype and exemplar processes. Formal simulations reveal that organisms will often (not always!) receive more useful signals about category belongingness if they average their exemplar experience into a prototype and use this as the comparative standard for categorization. This survey then provides the theoretical context for considering the evolution of cognitive systems for categorization. In the article's final sections, the author reviews recent research on the performance of nonhuman primates and humans in the tasks analyzed in the article. Diverse species share operating principles, default commitments, and processing weaknesses in categorization. From these commonalities, it may be possible to infer some properties of the categorization ecology these species generally experienced during cognitive evolution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 312-331 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Psychonomic Bulletin and Review |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2014 |
Keywords
- Categorization
- Cognitive evolution
- Comparative cognition
- Exemplars
- Prototypes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver