Protected Time, Resources, and Expectations for Academic Oncology Clinical Research Physicians

Background: In recent years, fewer physicians have entered research-related careers. For those who do, successful high-quality research requires dedicated time and financial support. These resources may vary over time and across centers. Methods: In 2019 and 2021, we dis-tributed surveys on physician faculty recruitment, effort, and evaluation to NCCN Member Institutions participating in the NCCN Best Practices Committee. We employed linear and logistic mixed-effect models to assess changes between years and Spearman’s rank correlation to evaluate associations between variables. Results: Surveys were completed by 16 of 30 invited institutions (53%) in 2019 and by 21 of 31 invited institutions (68%) in 2021. Eight institutions completed both surveys, with a total of 29 completing one or both. Across institutions, the proportion of clinical research faculty ranged from 20% to 90%. Clinical research faculty start-up packages were,$50,000/year at 43% of institutions and lasted #3 years at 81%. By contrast, physician-scientist faculty start-up packages were,$50,000/year at 10% of institutions and lasted #3 years at 48%. For clinical research faculty, outpatient clinic requirements ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 half-days per week. Al-though this requirement did not change from 2019 to 2021 (mean, 2.1 vs 2.3 half-days; P5.37), inpatient service requirements decreased (P5.02). Clinical requirements were not associated with institutional faculty distribution or the number of early-career grants received. The proportion of centers that considered clinical productivity in the evaluation of clinical research physician faculty success was 47% in 2019 and 65% in 2021, but this difference was not statistically significant (P5.44). Conclusions: Across cancer centers participating in the NCCN Best Practices Committee, clinical research physicians account for a varying proportion of physician faculty, have a wide range of clinical re-quirements, and appear to be increasingly evaluated according to clinical productivity.