Prospective teachers' reasoning and response to a student's non-traditional strategy when dividing fractions

Recognizing meaning in students' mathematical ideas is challenging, especially when such ideas are different from standard mathematics. This study examined, through a teaching-scenario task, the reasoning and responses of prospective elementary and secondary teachers to a student's non-traditional strategy for dividing fractions. Six categories of reasoning were constructed, making a distinction between deep and surface layers. The connections between the participants' reasoning, their teaching response, and their beliefs about mathematics teaching were investigated. We found that there were not only differences but also similarities between the prospective elementary and secondary teachers' reasoning and responses. We also found that those who unpacked the mathematical underpinning of the student's non-traditional strategy tended to use what we call "teacher-focused" responses, whereas those doing less analysis work tended to construct "student-focused" responses. These results and their implications are discussed in relation to the influential factors the participants themselves identified to explain their approach to the given teaching-scenario task.