Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Problematizing religious truth: Implications for public education

  • University of British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The question motivating this paper is whether or not there can be standards governing the evaluation of truth claims in religion. In other areas of study - such as physics, math, history, and even value-laden realms like morality - there is some widespread agreement as to what constitutes good thinking. If such a standard existed in religion, then our approach to teaching religion would need to change. This paper, however, is a prelude to examining such a question. In it, we briefly explore whether or not religion should even be included in public education. After concluding that it should be, we then look at whether we should pursue questions of truth in discussing religion or whether truth should be bracketed. If matters of truth are bracketed, what is lost? If questions of truth are pursued in our public school classrooms, what standards of evaluation should be applied to them?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-380
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Theory
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Problematizing religious truth: Implications for public education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this