Abstract
Using intradaily order flows processed via the Lee and Ready (1991) algorithm for NYSE/AMEX-listed stocks over the past 27 years, I estimate a set of price-impact parameters. The results provide strong evidence that price impact is priced in the cross-section of stock returns, even after controlling for risk factors, firm characteristics, and other low-frequency-based illiquidity proxies prevalent in the literature. While the Amihud (2002) measure is the best proxy of its kind, no low-frequency-based proxies can parallel the price-impact parameters. This suggests that price impact as a measure of illiquidity can be estimated more precisely by intradaily order flows, because it incorporates incremental information that comes out of high-frequency data. Therefore, price impact does a better job in capturing the return premium for illiquidity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-38 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Markets |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2014 |
Keywords
- Adverse-selection
- Asset pricing
- High-frequency-based measures
- Illiquidity
- Order flows
- Price-impact parameters
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Price impact and asset pricing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver