Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Practice patterns in pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for children with mild traumatic brain injury: A survey of 15 canadian and United States centers

  • Rebekah Mannix
  • , Roger Zemek
  • , Keith Owen Yeates
  • , Kristy Arbogast
  • , Shireen Atabaki
  • , Mohammed Badawy
  • , Miriam H. Beauchamp
  • , Darcy Beer
  • , Steven Bin
  • , Brett Burstein
  • , William Craig
  • , Dan Corwin
  • , Quynh Doan
  • , Michael Ellis
  • , Stephen B. Freedman
  • , Isabelle Gagnon
  • , Jocelyn Gravel
  • , John Leddy
  • , Angela Lumba-Brown
  • , Christina Master
  • Andrew R. Mayer, Grace Park, Michelle Penque, Tara Rhine, Kelly Russell, Kathryn Schneider, Michael Bell, Stephen Wisniewski
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Calgary
  • Center for Injury Research and Prevention
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Montreal
  • University of Manitoba
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • McGill University
  • University of Alberta
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • University of New Mexico
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Given the lack of evidence regarding effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and the resultant lack of treatment recommendations reflected in consensus guidelines, variation in the management of pediatric mTBI is to be expected. We therefore surveyed practitioners across 15 centers in the United States and Canada who care for children with pediatric mTBI to evaluate common-practice variation in the management of pediatric mTBI. The survey, developed by a panel of pediatric mTBI experts, consisted of a 10-item survey instrument regarding providers' perception of common pediatric mTBI symptoms and mTBI interventions. Surveys were distributed electronically to a convenience sample of local experts at each center. Frequencies and percentages (with confidence intervals [CI]) were determined for survey responses. One hundred and seven respondents (71% response rate) included specialists in pediatric Emergency Medicine, Sports Medicine, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, Physical and Occupational Therapy, Physiatry/Rehabilitation, and General Pediatrics. Respondents rated headache as the most prevalently reported symptom after pediatric mTBI, followed by cognitive problems, dizziness, and irritability. Of the 65 (61%; [95% CI: 51,70]) respondents able to prescribe medications, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (55%; [95% CI: 42,68]) and acetaminophen (59%; [95% CI: 46,71]) were most commonly recommended. One in five respondents reported prescribing amitriptyline for headache management after pediatric mTBI, whereas topiramate (8%; [95% CI: 3,17]) was less commonly reported. For cognitive problems, methylphenidate (11%; [95% CI: 4,21]) was used more commonly than amantadine (2%; [95% CI: 0,8]). The most common non-pharmacological interventions were rest ("always" or "often" recommended by 83% [95% CI: 63,92] of the 107 respondents), exercise (59%; [95%CI: 49,69]), vestibular therapy (42% [95%CI: 33,53]) and cervical spine exercises (29% [95%CI: 21,39]). Self-reported utilization for common pediatric mTBI interventions varied widely across our Canadian and United States consortium. Future effectiveness studies for pediatric mTBI are urgently needed to advance the evidence-based care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2886-2894
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume36
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2019

Keywords

  • concussion
  • intervention
  • mild traumatic brain injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Practice patterns in pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for children with mild traumatic brain injury: A survey of 15 canadian and United States centers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this