Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele

  • Jos H. Verbeek
  • , Paul Whaley
  • , Rebecca L. Morgan
  • , Kyla W. Taylor
  • , Andrew A. Rooney
  • , Lukas Schwingshackl
  • , Jan L. Hoving
  • , S. Vittal Katikireddi
  • , Beverley Shea
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , M. Hassan Murad
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Lancaster University
  • McMaster University
  • National Institute of Environment Health Science
  • University of Freiburg
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Kansas
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Article number107010
JournalEnvironment International
Volume160
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this