Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pigeons' categorization may be exclusively nonanalytic

  • J. David Smith
  • , F. Gregory Ashby
  • , Mark E. Berg
  • , Matthew S. Murphy
  • , Brian Spiering
  • , Robert G. Cook
  • , Randolph C. Grace
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • Stockton University
  • Tufts University
  • University of Canterbury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent theoretical and empirical developments in human category learning have differentiated an analytic, rule-based system of category learning from a nonanalytic system that integrates information across stimulus dimensions. In the present study, the researchers applied this theoretical distinction to pigeons' category learning. Pigeons learned to categorize stimuli varying in the tilt and width of their internal striping. The matched category problems had either a unidimensional (rule-based) or multidimensional (information-integration) solution. Whereas humans and nonhuman primates strongly dimensionalize these stimuli and learn rule-based tasks far more quickly than information-integration tasks, pigeons learned the two tasks equally quickly to the same accuracy level. Pigeons may represent a cognitive system in which the commitment to dimensional analysis and category rules was not strongly made. Their performance could suggest the character of the ancestral vertebrate categorization system from which that of primates emerged.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-421
Number of pages8
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Keywords

  • Analytic/nonanalytic cognition
  • Category learning
  • Comparative cognition
  • Implicit/explicit cognition
  • Pigeons
  • Rules

Cite this