Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perioperative Femur Fractures in muscle sparing anterolateral - Modified Watson-Jones approach to primary total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic femur fractures (PFF) are a rare early complication in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) that may result in revision and burden the healthcare system. A previous study identified a PFF rate of 8.3 % at 90 days with the modified anterolateral Watson-Jones (AL) approach to THA. This study assesses the PFF rate and risk factors with this approach at 90 days and 1-year post-operative follow-up. Methods: 580 primary THAs performed using the AL approach were retrospectively reviewed for risk factors associated with perioperative PFF including demographics, intra-operative and postoperative factors, and disposition. Results: 507 included patients had a 90-day PFF rate of 1.6 % (n = 8): 6 intraoperative (1.2 %), and 2 postoperative (0.4 %), significantly lower than previously reported (p < 0.001). 1 additional postoperative PFF fracture was operatively managed with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) on day 302; 1-year PFF rate was 2.5 %. All fractures healed uneventfully after treatment. The 1-year return to operating room rate for PFF was 0.3 %. Patients with PFF were significantly older (p = 0.036) compared to non-PFF patients. Implant type significantly predicted PFF. Conclusion: The rarity of PFF among our cohort highlights the efficacy of the AL approach to avoid this complication.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102828
JournalJournal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Periprosthetic femur fracture
  • THA
  • Watson-Jones approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perioperative Femur Fractures in muscle sparing anterolateral - Modified Watson-Jones approach to primary total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this