TY - GEN
T1 - Performance of visually impaired users during simulated boarding and alighting on low-floor buses
AU - Bareria, Piyush
AU - D'Souza, Clive
AU - Lenker, James
AU - Paquet, Victor
AU - Steinfeld, Edward
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Low-floor buses with folding ramp access represent a significant improvement in accessible public transit for passengers with mobility disabilities. However, the safety and usability aspects of the interior design of low-floor buses on blind and visually impaired users has not been studied in much detail. A laboratory study was completed using a static full-scale simulation of a low-floor bus to evaluate the impact of seating configuration and crowding on interior movement and accessibility for individuals with (n=18) and without visual impairments (n=17). The protocol simulated bus journeys including boarding, fare payment, seating, and alighting. Results from video observations and subjective assessments showed differences in boarding and alighting performance and users' perceptions of task difficulty across different bus layout designs The results suggest the need for more supportive design features (e.g. guide rails, handholds), legroom, and space for guide dogs to improve accommodation for passengers who are visually impaired. Such design improvements will also support a universal design approach that takes into consideration the needs of a diverse passenger population.
AB - Low-floor buses with folding ramp access represent a significant improvement in accessible public transit for passengers with mobility disabilities. However, the safety and usability aspects of the interior design of low-floor buses on blind and visually impaired users has not been studied in much detail. A laboratory study was completed using a static full-scale simulation of a low-floor bus to evaluate the impact of seating configuration and crowding on interior movement and accessibility for individuals with (n=18) and without visual impairments (n=17). The protocol simulated bus journeys including boarding, fare payment, seating, and alighting. Results from video observations and subjective assessments showed differences in boarding and alighting performance and users' perceptions of task difficulty across different bus layout designs The results suggest the need for more supportive design features (e.g. guide rails, handholds), legroom, and space for guide dogs to improve accommodation for passengers who are visually impaired. Such design improvements will also support a universal design approach that takes into consideration the needs of a diverse passenger population.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84873427208
U2 - 10.1177/1071181312561137
DO - 10.1177/1071181312561137
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84873427208
SN - 9780945289418
T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
SP - 656
EP - 660
BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012
T2 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012
Y2 - 22 October 2012 through 26 October 2012
ER -