Abstract
This paper explores the feasibility of deploying optical burst switching (OBS) in metropolitan area networks (MANs) as an alternative to synchronous optical network (SONET), over wavelength-division multiplexing. We present a comparison between two OBS architectures (with centralized and distributed scheduling schemes), SONET, and next-generation SONET (NG-SONET), respectively. We quantify some of the performance metrics such as end-to-end delay and loss rate when supporting Ethernet traffic in metro ring networks. Our simulation results show that OBS offers significant performance improvement over SONET and NG-SONET. In general, the OBS architecture with distributed scheduling has a superior delay performance, whereas the OBS architecture with centralized scheduling has a better loss metric.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1474-1482 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2004 |
Keywords
- Ethernet
- Link capacity adjustment scheme (LCAS)
- Next-generation synchronous optical network (NG-SONET)
- OBS-just enough time (JET)
- Optical burst switching (OBS)
- Synchronous optical network (SONET)
- Virtual concatenation (VC)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance comparison of OBS and SONET in metropolitan ring networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver