Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Percutaneous Subclavian Vein Catheterization: Too Much of a Good Thing?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Eighty-one percutaneous subclavian vein catheterizations (PSVCs) were randomly selected for retrospective audits. Physicians with varied levels of experience were performing PSVCs In many patient care areas. The Incidence of pneumothorax was 12.4%. After impersonal contacts by the audit committee failed to reduce that rate, a concurrent audit process with direct physician contact was initiated. This reduced the complication rate significantly. Because earlier published reports had associated PSVCs with low complication rates, operator caution may have given way to overzealous use by undertrained physicians. Direct physician involvement in quality-assurance programs can enhance patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1407-1408
Number of pages2
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume144
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1984

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Percutaneous Subclavian Vein Catheterization: Too Much of a Good Thing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this