Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perceptions of White Women’s Stigma-Based Solidarity Claims and Disingenuous Allyship

  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Efforts to promote allyship often focus on creating a common ingroup identity between marginalized and privileged groups, including making salient stigma-based solidarity. In addition, research on allyship perceptions highlights that allies are viewed as more genuine when they are not perceived as motivated by self-interests. Integrating research on allyship perceptions and stigma-based solidarity, the present research examined Black Americans’ perceptions of White women’s allyship messages that focus on stigma-based solidarity. In three experiments (Ntotal = 851), White women claiming stigma-based solidarity highlighting shared perpetrators (Studies 1–3) or shared discrimination (Study 3) were perceived as less genuine allies (i.e., less trustworthy and self-sacrificing) who were motivated to reduce racism for their own self-interests compared to allyship claims that only highlighted racism (Studies 1–3) or no allyship claims (Study 2). These findings add to a growing literature documenting marginalized groups’ suspicion of privileged groups’ motives when claiming allyship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-518
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • allyship
  • anti-racism
  • collective action
  • intraminority relations
  • stigma-based solidarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of White Women’s Stigma-Based Solidarity Claims and Disingenuous Allyship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this