Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pegaspargase hypersensitivity reactions: intravenous infusion versus intramuscular injection–a review

  • Lynda Kwon Beaupin
  • , Bruce Bostrom
  • , Matthew J. Barth
  • , Irene Franklin
  • , Raven Jaeger
  • , Priyanka Kamath
  • , Brian Schreiber
  • , Archie Bleyer
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Children’s Minnesota
  • Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  • Oregon Health and Science University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pegaspargase is a mainstay in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. When intravenous (IV) infusion replaced intramuscular (IM) injection as the standard route of administration, there were early reports suggested an increased hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) rate with IV administration. There have since been eight published reports comparing the incidence of HSRs occurring with IV versus IM pegaspargase. This review analyzes the reports and summarizes their consistent findings where feasible. For grade 3–4 HSRs, the rates are comparable with IV and IM administration. Grade 2 HSRs appear to be more likely with IV than IM administration but the validity of the difference is uncertain. Multiple factors confound the analyses, including the historically controlled nature of the comparisons and the increased likelihood of reporting adverse reactions with IV administration. In summary, the reports do not support the conclusion that pegaspargase-induced HSR rate is more frequent with IV administration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-772
Number of pages7
JournalLeukemia and Lymphoma
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2017

Keywords

  • Pegaspargase
  • asparaginase
  • hypersensitivity
  • intramuscular
  • intravenous

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pegaspargase hypersensitivity reactions: intravenous infusion versus intramuscular injection–a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this