Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • P. J. Devereaux
  • , Diane Heels-Ansdell
  • , Christina Lacchetti
  • , Ted Haines
  • , Karen E.A. Burns
  • , Deborah J. Cook
  • , Nikila Ravindran
  • , S. D. Walter
  • , Heather McDonald
  • , Samuel B. Stone
  • , Rakesh Patel
  • , Mohit Bhandari
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Peter T.L. Choi
  • , Ahmed M. Bayoumi
  • , John N. Lavis
  • , Terrence Sullivan
  • , Greg Stoddart
  • , Gordon H. Guyatt
  • McMaster University
  • Western University
  • University of Toronto
  • Axon Clinical Research
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of British Columbia
  • Cancer Care Ontario

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

104 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: It has been shown that patients cared for at private for-profit hospitals have higher risk-adjusted mortality rates than those cared for at private not-for-profit hospitals. Uncertainty remains, however, about the economic implications of these forms of health care delivery. Since some policy-makers might still consider for-profit health care if expenditure savings were sufficiently large, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. Methods: We used 6 search strategies to identify published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. We masked the study results before teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. We confirmed data or obtained additional data from all but 1 author. For each study, we calculated the payments for care at private for-profit hospitals relative to private not-for-profit hospitals and pooled the results using a random effects model. Results: Eight observational studies, involving more than 350 000 patients altogether and a median of 324 hospitals each, fulfilled our eligibility criteria. In 5 of 6 studies showing higher payments for care at private for-profit hospitals, the difference was statistically significant; in 1 of 2 studies showing higher payments for care at private not-for-profit hospitals, the difference was statistically significant. The pooled estimate demonstrated that private for-profit hospitals were associated with higher payments for care (relative payments for care 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.33, p = 0.001). Interpretation: Private for-profit hospitals result in higher payments for care than private not-for-profit hospitals. Evidence strongly supports a policy of not-for-profit health care delivery at the hospital level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1817-1824
Number of pages8
JournalCMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
Volume170
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 8 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this