Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations

  • Simon Haroutounian
  • , Katherine J. Holzer
  • , Robert D. Kerns
  • , Christin Veasley
  • , Robert H. Dworkin
  • , Dennis C. Turk
  • , Kristin L. Carman
  • , Christine T. Chambers
  • , Penney Cowan
  • , Robert R. Edwards
  • , James C. Eisenach
  • , John T. Farrar
  • , McKenzie Ferguson
  • , Laura P. Forsythe
  • , Roy Freeman
  • , Jennifer S. Gewandter
  • , Ian Gilron
  • , Christine Goertz
  • , Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
  • , Smriti Iyengar
  • Isabel Jordan, Cornelia Kamp, Bethea A. Kleykamp, Rachel L. Knowles, Dale J. Langford, Sean Mackey, Richard Malamut, John Markman, Kathryn R. Martin, Ewan McNicol, Kushang V. Patel, Andrew S.C. Rice, Michael Rowbotham, Friedhelm Sandbrink, Lee S. Simon, Deborah J. Steiner, Jan Vollert
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Yale University
  • Chronic Pain Research Alliance
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Washington
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Dalhousie University
  • American Chronic Pain Association
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Wake Forest University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Southern Illinois University
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Duke University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Medical Research Council (Part of UK Research and Innovation)
  • Hospital for Special Surgery - New York
  • Stanford University
  • MedinCell Pharmaceutics
  • University of Aberdeen
  • Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
  • Imperial College London
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • VA Medical Center
  • SDG LLC
  • Eli Lilly
  • Universitätsklinikum Kiel
  • University of Münster
  • Heidelberg University 

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the traditional clinical research model, patients are typically involved only as participants. However, there has been a shift in recent years highlighting the value and contributions that patients bring as members of the research team, across the clinical research lifecycle. It is becoming increasingly evident that to develop research that is both meaningful to people who have the targeted condition and is feasible, there are important benefits of involving patients in the planning, conduct, and dissemination of research from its earliest stages. In fact, research funders and regulatory agencies are now explicitly encouraging, and sometimes requiring, that patients are engaged as partners in research. Although this approach has become commonplace in some fields of clinical research, it remains the exception in clinical pain research. As such, the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials convened a meeting with patient partners and international representatives from academia, patient advocacy groups, government regulatory agencies, research funding organizations, academic journals, and the biopharmaceutical industry to develop consensus recommendations for advancing patient engagement in all stages of clinical pain research in an effective and purposeful manner. This article summarizes the results of this meeting and offers considerations for meaningful and authentic engagement of patient partners in clinical pain research, including recommendations for representation, timing, continuous engagement, measurement, reporting, and research dissemination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1013-1028
Number of pages16
JournalPain
Volume165
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Pain
  • Patient engagement
  • Patient partners

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this