Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Overview of Different Flow Diverters and Flow Dynamics

  • Georgios A. Maragkos
  • , Adam A. Dmytriw
  • , Mohamed M. Salem
  • , Vincent M. Tutino
  • , Hui Meng
  • , Christophe Cognard
  • , Paolo MacHi
  • , Timo Krings
  • , Vitor Mendes Pereira
  • Harvard University
  • University of Toronto
  • Centre Hopitalier de Toulouse
  • CHU Montpellier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the past decade, flow diverter technology for endocranial aneurysms has seen rapid evolution, with the development of new devices quickly outpacing the clinical evidence base. However, flow diversion has not yet been directly compared to surgical aneurysm clipping or other endovascular procedures. The oldest and most well-studied device is the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic), recently transitioned to the Pipeline Flex (Medtronic), which still has sparse data regarding outcomes. To date, other flow diverting devices have not been shown to outperform the PED, although information comes primarily from retrospective studies with short follow-up, which are not always comparable. Because of this lack of high-quality outcome data, no reliable recommendations can be made for choosing among flow diversion devices yet. Moreover, the decision to proceed with flow diversion should be individualized to each patient. In this work, we wish to provide a comprehensive overview of the technical specifications of all flow diverter devices currently available, accompanied by a succinct description of the evidence base surrounding each device.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S21-S34
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume86
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Keywords

  • Cerebral aneurysm
  • Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
  • Embolization
  • Endovascular
  • Interventional neuroradiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Overview of Different Flow Diverters and Flow Dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this