Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes of DCD kidneys recovered for transplantation with versus without pre-mortem heparin administration

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Pre-mortem heparin administration during donation after circulatory death (DCD) organ recovery may be particularly important to improve perfusion and prevent graft thrombosis. However, pre-mortem heparin administration is not universally practiced in the US and scarce data exist regarding its efficacy. Methods: Using a national transplant registry data, we identified DCD kidneys recovered for transplantation from January 1, 2003, to March 10, 2017, and examined discard and outcomes after transplantation using bivariate and multivariable analyses. Organs with unknown or missing donor heparin status (n = 193), seropositive HIV (n = 10), HTLV (n = 33), hepatitis B (n = 26), or hepatitis C (n = 648) were excluded. Results: Of 24 861 DCD kidneys recovered with (n = 22 557) or without pre-mortem heparin administration (n = 2304), discard occurred in 19.1% and 20.8%, respectively (P = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, heparin use was not associated with discard (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.17, P = 0.820). Overall graft survival of no-heparin (n = 1791) vs heparin groups (n = 17 968) was similar on univariate and multivariate analysis (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87-1.09, P = 0.640). Conclusion: DCD kidneys from donors that have not received pre-mortem heparin administration have acceptable transplant outcomes and are not associated with discard.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13624
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • donation after circulatory death
  • heparinization
  • pre-mortem
  • pre-mortem heparin administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of DCD kidneys recovered for transplantation with versus without pre-mortem heparin administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this