Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes after transplantation of deceased-donor kidneys with rising serum creatinine

  • C. Morgan
  • , A. Martin
  • , R. Shapiro
  • , P. S. Randhawa
  • , L. K. Kayler
  • University of Pittsburgh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

The increasing number of candidates for kidney transplantation and relatively unchanged deceased-donor pool has led to expansion in the criteria for donor acceptability. Outcomes of kidneys from donors with progressively rising creatinine values have not been reported. Patients transplanted between September 2003 and August 2006 with kidneys from donors with peak creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dL were stratified into two groups based on the terminal creatinine and evaluated for outcome: (1) falling creatinine (FC)(n = 27), terminal creatinine at least 0.2mg/dL less than peak, and (2) rising creatinine (RC)(n = 24), terminal creatinine = peak. The mean terminal creatinine was significantly higher in the RC group (3.2 ± 1.3 mg/dL) compared to the FC group (1.9 ± 0.9 mg/dL)(p < 0.0001). Peak creatinine values were similar (RC, 3.2 ± 1.3; FC, 3.1 ± 1.3; p = 0.6521) between the two groups. Rates of delayed graft function (RC, 24%; FC 32%; p = 0.7881) and mean creatinine at follow-up (RC, 1.6 ± 0.6, FC 1.6 ± 0.4; p = 0.3533) were not significantly different. With a mean follow-up of 287 ± 274 days, allograft survival was 92% in the RC recipients and 89% in the FC recipients. Under certain conditions, kidneys from donors with rising serum creatinine can be used safely with reasonable early outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1288-1292
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Keywords

  • Acute tubular necrosis
  • Deceased-donor
  • Kidney transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes after transplantation of deceased-donor kidneys with rising serum creatinine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this