Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake

  • Cornell University
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) has a potent orexic effect, it is not clear how NPY changes the potency of peripheral feedbacks from the gut to prolong eating and increase meal size. It has been suggested that NPY increases the stimulating effect of orosensory sweet stimuli or that it decreases the inhibitory effect of postingestive stimuli. To clarify this issue, we compared the orexic effect of NPY (2 μg) injected into the third ventricle of the brain on the volume and microstructure of intake of 0.8 M sucrose during sham feeding (SF) and real feeding (RF) in male Sprague Dawley rats. The rationale for this comparison is that orosensory stimulation occurs in SF and RF, but postingestive negative feedback is present only in RF. NPY increased the volume ingested and the rate and number of clusters of licking significantly more in SF than in RF. This demonstrates that orosensory sucrose stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for the orexic effect of NPY under these experimental conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)773-780
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2006

Keywords

  • Control of food intake
  • Hyperphagia
  • Microstructure of eating
  • Sham feeding
  • Sweet taste

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this