Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Oral cedazuridine/decitabine for MDS and CMML: A phase 2 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic randomized crossover study

  • Guillermo Garcia-Manero
  • , Elizabeth A. Griffiths
  • , David P. Steensma
  • , Gail J. Roboz
  • , Richard Wells
  • , James McCloskey
  • , Olatoyosi Odenike
  • , Amy E. DeZern
  • , Karen Yee
  • , Lambert Busque
  • , Casey O’Connell
  • , Laura C. Michaelis
  • , Joseph Brandwein
  • , Hagop Kantarjian
  • , Aram Oganesian
  • , Mohammad Azab
  • , Michael R. Savona
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • University of Toronto
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • The University of Chicago
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University Health Network
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
  • University of Southern California
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • University of Alberta
  • Astex Pharmaceuticals
  • Vanderbilt University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

190 Scopus citations

Abstract

This phase 2 study was designed to compare systemic decitabine exposure, demethylation activity, and safety in the first 2 cycles with cedazuridine 100 mg/decitabine 35 mg vs standard decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV. Adults with International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1/2- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) were randomized 1:1 to receive oral cedazuridine/decitabine or IV decitabine in cycle 1, followed by crossover to the other treatment in cycle 2. All patients received oral cedazuridine/decitabine in subsequent cycles. Cedazuridine and decitabine were given initially as separate capsules in a dose-confirmation stage and then as a single fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet. Primary end points: mean decitabine systemic exposure (geometric least-squares mean [LSM]) of oral/IV 5-day area under curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUClast), percentage long interspersed nuclear element 1 (LINE-1) DNA demethylation for oral cedazuridine/decitabine vs IV decitabine, and clinical response. Eighty patients were randomized and treated. Oral/IV ratios of geometric LSM 5-day AUClast (80% confidence interval) were 93.5% (82.1-106.5) and 97.6% (80.5-118.3) for the dose-confirmation and FDC stages, respectively. Differences in mean % LINE-1 demethylation between oral and IV were £1%. Clinical responses were observed in 48 patients (60%), including 17 (21%) with complete response. The most common grade ‡3 adverse events regardless of causality were neutropenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and febrile neutropenia (29%). Oral cedazuridine/decitabine (100/35 mg) produced similar systemic decitabine exposure, DNA demethylation, and safety vs decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV in the first 2 cycles, with similar efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)674-683
Number of pages10
JournalBlood
Volume136
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral cedazuridine/decitabine for MDS and CMML: A phase 2 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic randomized crossover study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this