Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior urethral stricture: 2-year results of the ROBUST III trial

  • Maia E. VanDyke
  • , Allen F. Morey
  • , Karl Coutinho
  • , Kaiser J. Robertson
  • , Richard D'Anna
  • , Kent Chevli
  • , Christopher H. Cantrill
  • , Michael J. Ehlert
  • , Alexis E. Te
  • , Jeffrey Dann
  • , Jessica M. DeLong
  • , Ramón Virasoro
  • , Judith C. Hagedorn
  • , Richard Levin
  • , Euclid DeSouza
  • , David DiMarco
  • , Brad A. Erickson
  • , Carl Olsson
  • , Sean P. Elliott
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • New Jersey Urology LLC
  • Chesapeake Urology
  • Arkansas Urology
  • Urology San Antonio
  • a division of Minnesota Urology
  • Cornell University
  • Advanced Urology Institute
  • MultiCare Urology
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Washington
  • Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
  • Adult and Pediatric Urology PC
  • Oregon Urology Institute
  • University of Iowa
  • Integrated Medical Professionals
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to report the updated 2-year results of the intervention arm of the ROBUST III randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus standard endoscopic management of recurrent male anterior urethral stricture. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients included men with recurrent anterior urethral stricture ≤3 cm in length and ≤12Fr in diameter, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥11 and peak flow rate (Qmax) <15 mL/s. Patients were randomized to treatment with the Optilume DCB or standard-of-care endoscopic management. Primary efficacy endpoints measured at 2 years included freedom from re-intervention and changes in IPSS, Qmax and post-void residual (PVR). Secondary endpoint was impact on sexual function using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 127 patients enrolled at 22 sites in the United States and Canada (48 randomized to standard-of-care dilation and 79 to DCB dilation). Seventy-five patients in the DCB arm entered the open-label phase after 6 months. Participants averaged 3.2 prior endoscopic interventions (range 2–10); most (89.9%) had bulbar strictures with an average stricture length of 1.63 cm (SD 0.76). Significant improvements in IPSS, average Qmax and PVR were maintained at 2 years. Freedom from repeat intervention was significantly higher in the Optilume DCB arm at 2 years versus the Control arm at 1 year (77.8% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, there were 15 treatment failures and two non-study-related deaths. Treatment-related AEs were rare and generally self-limited (haematuria, dysuria and urinary tract infection). Conclusion: The Optilume DCB shows sustained improvement in both objective and subjective voiding parameters at 2-year follow-up. Optilume appears to provide a safe and effective endoscopic treatment alternative for short recurrent anterior urethral strictures among men who wish to avoid or delay formal urethroplasty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-373
Number of pages8
JournalBJUI Compass
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • anterior urethral strictures
  • bladder outlet obstruction
  • lower urinary tract symptoms
  • urethral dilation
  • urethral stricture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optilume drug-coated balloon for anterior urethral stricture: 2-year results of the ROBUST III trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this