Abstract
This paper defends a view of the Gene Ontology (GO) and of Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) as examples of what the manufacturing industry calls product-service systems. This means that they are products bundled with a range of ontology services such as updates, training, help desk, and permanent identifiers. The paper argues that GO and BFO are contrasted in this respect with DOLCE, which approximates more closely to a scientific theory or a scientific publication. The paper provides a detailed overview of ontology services and concludes with a discussion of some implications of the product-service system approach for the understanding of the nature of applied ontology. Ontology developer communities are compared in this respect with developers of scientific theories and of standards (such as W3C).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Volume | 2931 |
| State | Published - 2019 |
| Event | 10th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, ICBO 2019 - Buffalo, United States Duration: Jul 30 2019 → Aug 2 2019 |
Keywords
- Basic formal ontology
- Domain ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering
- Product-service system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ontology as product-service system: Lessons learned from GO, BFO and DOLCE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver