Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On optimum selection relaying protocols in cooperative wireless networks

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this letter, the outage probabilities of selection relaying protocols are analyzed and compared for cooperative wireless networks. It is assumed that both source and relay use equal allocated time in transmission. Depending on the quality of the source-relay channel, the relay may choose either Decode-and-Forward (DF), Amplify-and-Forward (AF), or Direct-Transmission (DT) to forward signals. It turns out that in terms of outage probability, two selection relaying schemes are better than others: selecting between DF and AF protocols (DF-AF) or selecting between DF and DT protocols (DF-DT). It is shown that with an equal power allocation, both of the DF-AF and DF-DT selection relaying protocols have the same asymptotic outage probability. However, with an optimum power allocation strategy, the DF-AF selection scheme is in general better than the DF-DT selection scheme. Note that the optimum power allocations depend on channel variances, not on instantaneous channel gains. When the quality of the relay-destination link is much better than that of the source-relay link, observed from simulation, the outage probability of the DF-AF selection protocol with its optimum power allocation is 1.5dB better than that of the DF-DT selection with its own optimum power allocation. Extensive simulations are presented to validate the analytical results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5397895
Pages (from-to)52-57
Number of pages6
JournalIEEE Transactions on Communications
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Amplify-andforward (AF) relaying
  • Cooperative communications
  • Ecode-and-forward (DF) relaying
  • Optimum power allocation
  • Selection relaying
  • Wireless network

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On optimum selection relaying protocols in cooperative wireless networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this