Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On defining bruxism

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a series of recent publications, orofacial researchers have debated the question of how 'bruxism' should be defined for the purposes of accurate diagnosis and reliable clinical research. Following the principles of realism-based ontology, we performed an analysis of the arguments involved. This revealed that the disagreements rested primarily on inconsistent use of terms, so that issues of ontology were thus obfuscated by shortfalls in terminology. In this paper, we demonstrate how bruxism terminology can be improved by paying attention to the relationships between (1) particulars and types, and (2) continuants and occurrents.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBuilding Continents of Knowledge in Oceans of Data
Subtitle of host publicationThe Future of Co-Created eHealth - Proceedings of MIE 2018
EditorsGunnar O. Klein, Daniel Karlsson, Anne Moen, Adrien Ugon
PublisherIOS Press
Pages551-555
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781614998518
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018
Event40th Medical Informatics in Europe Conference, MIE 2018 - Gothenburg, Sweden
Duration: Apr 24 2018Apr 26 2018

Publication series

NameStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume247
ISSN (Print)0926-9630
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8365

Conference

Conference40th Medical Informatics in Europe Conference, MIE 2018
Country/TerritorySweden
CityGothenburg
Period04/24/1804/26/18

Keywords

  • Bruxism
  • Ontology
  • Terminology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On defining bruxism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this