Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nuclear morphometry automatic biopsy in and radical prostatectomy specimens of prostatic carcinoma: A comparison

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nuclear shape analysis performed upon prostatectomy specimens of prostatic carcinoma distinguished individual patients with good and poor prognoses. In order to be useful for prognosis assessment preoperatively, nuclear morphometry must be measured on needle biopsy specimens. We compared nuclear morphometry on automatic biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in 20 patients with prostatic carcinoma. Nuclear size was smaller (paired Student t test, P < .0001) in biopsy specimens (perimeter 17.0 ± SD 4.9 μm, area 29.9 ± 6.6 μm2) than in prostatectomy specimens (perimeter 24.6 ± 4.4 μm, area 48.2 ± 8.7 μm2). Nuclear shape was more abnormal in automatic biopsy specimens (nuclear roundness factor 82.0 ± 18.8, ellipticity 90.5 ± 27.7) than in surgical specimens (nuclear roundness factor 43.5 ± 8.8, ellipticity 54.0 ± 14.7) (P < .0001). Study of specimens obtained by automatic biopsy preoperatively and automatic biopsy of the prostatectomy specimens at various steps of processing revealed that nuclear swelling and rounding occurred after 2-24 hours of formalin fixation. Automatic prostate biopsies may more accurately reflect true nuclear morphometry and should be studied for preoperative prognosis prediction in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-420
Number of pages6
JournalAnalytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology
Volume16
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1994

Keywords

  • automatic biopsy
  • carcinoma
  • nuclear morphometry
  • prostatectomy
  • prostatic neoplasms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nuclear morphometry automatic biopsy in and radical prostatectomy specimens of prostatic carcinoma: A comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this